On Recognizing Argumentation Schemes in Formal Text Genres By: Nancy L. Green Green, N. L. On Recognizing Argumentation Schemes in Formal Text
نویسنده
چکیده
Argumentation mining research should address the challenge of recognition of argumentation schemes in formal text genres such as scientific articles. This paper argues that identification of argumentation schemes differs from identification of other aspects of discourse such as argumentative zones and coherence relations. Argumentation schemes can be defined at a level of abstraction applicable across the natural sciences. There are useful applications of automatic argumentation scheme recognition. However, it is likely that inference-based techniques will be required. Keyword: argumentation schemes
منابع مشابه
Implementing Argumentation Schemes as Logic Programs
The dominant approach to argumentation mining has been to treat it as a text classification problem. However some applications to scientific text, such as accurately summarizing argumentation in research articles, require a deeper understanding of the text. This paper provides a novel approach in which argumentation schemes are represented as logic program rules for use in argumentation mining....
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentation Schemes in Genetics Research Articles
This paper presents preliminary work on identification of argumentation schemes, i.e., identifying premises, conclusion and name of argumentation scheme, in arguments for scientific claims in genetics research articles. The goal is to develop annotation guidelines for creating corpora for argumentation mining research. This paper gives the specification of ten semantically distinct argumentatio...
متن کاملArgumentation for Scientific Claims in a Biomedical Research Article
This paper provides an analysis of some argumentation in a biomedical genetics research article as a step towards developing a corpus of articles annotated to support research on argumentation. We present a specification of several argumentation schemes and inter-argument relationships to be annotated.
متن کاملArgumentation Schemes for Critical Thinking on Current Events
We have been examining a class of arguments used in sophisticated analyses of current events, with the goal of developing a visualization tool that would assist users in understanding or producing those kinds of arguments. While some current tools make argumentation scheme sets available, they do not describe an important class of arguments. This paper describes work in progress to identify tho...
متن کاملArgumentation Mining in Scientific Discourse
The dominant approach to argumentation mining has been to treat argumentation scheme detection as a machine learning problem based upon superficial text features, and to treat the relationships between arguments as support or attack. However, applications such as accurately representing and summarizing argumentation in scientific research articles require a deeper understanding of the text and ...
متن کامل